Military Topix

Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » General » General » The Campaigns of Napoleon  
Categories
General
Military Science
US History
WW II
WW I
Civil War
Napoleonic
Uniforms
Naval
Weapons
Espionage
Regiments
Visit Miniature Wargaming, the net's best site for the wargaming hobby.

Discount Military Collectibles and Militaria

Books On Technology, Computers and the Internet

Cheap Discount Laptops

Related Categories
• General
World
History
Subjects
Books
• General
France
Europe
History
Subjects
• General
Napoleonic Wars
Military
History
Subjects
• Napoleon
Napoleonic Wars
Military
History
Subjects
• Hardcover
Binding (binding)
Refinements
Books
• Printed Books
Format (feature_browse-bin)
Refinements
Books

The Campaigns of Napoleon

The Campaigns of Napoleon

zoom enlarge 
Author: David G. Chandler
Publisher: Scribner
Category: Book

List Price: $85.00
Buy Used: $27.89
You Save: $57.11 (67%)



New (21) Used (25) from $27.89

Avg. Customer Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars 35 reviews
Sales Rank: 252691

Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 1172
Shipping Weight (lbs): 4
Dimensions (in): 9.6 x 7 x 2.4

ISBN: 0025236601
Dewey Decimal Number: 940.270924
EAN: 9780025236608
ASIN: 0025236601

Publication Date: March 1, 1973
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Condition: Regular Used book. Some of our used books may have small scuffs/remainder marks but are mostly pristine and gently read. Same day superfast shipping and excellent customer service.

Similar Items:

  • Swords Around A Throne
  • Atlas for the Wars of Napoleon (West Point Military History)
  • Art of Warfare in the Age of Napoleon
  • The Napoleonic Wars (Smithsonian History of Warfare) (Smithsonian History of Warfare)
  • Tactics and the Experience of Battle in the Age of Napoleon

Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
Napoleonic war was nothing if not complex -- an ever-shifting kaleidoscope of moves and intentions, which by themselves went a long way towards baffling and dazing his conventionally-minded opponents into that state of disconcerting moral disequilibrium which so often resulted in their catastrophic defeat."

The Campaigns of Napoleon is an exhaustive analysis and critique of Napoleon's art of war as he himself developed and perfected it in the major military campaigns of his career. Napoleon disavowed any suggestion that he worked from formula ("Je n'ai jamais eu un plan d'operations"), but military historian David Chandler demonstrates this was at best only a half-truth. To be sure, every operation Napoleon conducted contained unique improvisatory features. But there were from the first to the last certain basic principles of strategic maneuver and battlefield planning that he almost invariably put into practice. To clarify these underlying methods, as well as the style of Napoleon's fabulous intellect, Mr. Chandler examines in detail each campaign mounted and personally conducted by Napoleon, analyzing the strategies employed, revealing wherever possible the probable sources of his subject's military ideas.

The book opens with a brief account of Bonaparte's early years, his military education and formative experiences, and his meteoric rise to the rank of general in the army of the Directory. Introducing the elements of Napoleonic "grand tactics" as they developed in his Italian, Egyptian, and Syrian campaigns, Mr. Chandler shows how these principles were clearly conceived as early as the Battle of Castiglione, when Napoleon was only twenty -six. Several campaigns later, he was Emperor of France, busily constructing the Grande Armee. This great war machine is described in considerable detail: the composition of the armies and the elite Guard; the staff system and the methods of command; the kind of artillery and firearms used; and the daily life of the Grande Armee and the all-seeing and all-commanding virtuoso who presided over every aspect of its operation in the field.

As the great machine sweeps into action in the campaigns along the Rhine and the Danube, in East Prussia and Poland, and in Portugal and Spain, David Chandler follows closely every move that vindicates -- or challenges -- the legend of Napoleon's military genius. As the major battles take their gory courses -- Austerlitz, Jena, Fried-land -- we see Napoleon's star reaching its zenith. Then, in the Wagram Campaign of 1809 against the Austrians -- his last real success -- the great man commits more errors of judgment than in all his previous wars and battles put together. As the campaigns rage on, his declining powers seem to justify his own statement: "One has but a short time for war." Then the horrors of the Russian campaign forever shatter the image of Napoleonic invincibility. It is thereafter a short, though heroic and sanguinary, road to Waterloo and St. Helena.

Napoleon appears most strikingly in these pages as the brilliant applier of the ideas of others rather than as an original military thinker, his genius proving itself more practical than theoretical. Paradoxically, this was both his chief strength and his main weakness as a general. After bringing the French army a decade of victory, his methods became increasingly stereotyped and, even worse, were widely copied by his foes, who operated against him with increasing effectiveness toward the end of his career. Yet even though his enemies attempted to imitate his techniques, as have others in the last century and a half, no one ever equaled his success. As these meticulous campaign analyses testify, his multifaceted genius was unique. Even as the end approached, as David Chandler points out, his eclipse was "the failure of a giant surrounded by pygmies."

"The flight of the eagle was over; the 'ogre' was safely caged at last, and an exhausted Europe settled down once more to attempt a return to former ways of life and government. But the shade of Napoleon lingered on irresistibly for many years after his death in 1821. It lingers yet."


Customer Reviews:   Read 30 more reviews...

5 out of 5 stars The legend of a man who sought it all!!   September 11, 2008
When I purchased this book, I was a complete neophyte in the knowledge of Napoleon Bonaparte. After reading this rather definitive work of David Chandler, I must say I do understand him a bit more.
Napoleon was trained in the military to be an artillery officer. He quickly grasped the tactical and later the strategically significant concepts of modern warfare. At a very young age he became a General in the Army of France. His tactics as a small unit leader led way to his promotion at a young age as a General Officer.
During the campaigns in Spain he made a name for himself as he recorded military victories. He became a legend. Indeed he was a winner. He became the grand conqueror and won battles in Austria, Spain and onto the heartland of the German Countries.
He was relentless in his pursuit of total domination of Europe. He schemed in his campaigns to win his objectives and settle for peace. And like a rubber ball he would set out for his next conquest.
While reading this, I started to deduce that these actions resembled the intentions and motives of Adolph Hitler over 130 years later. While Napoleon was a true pedigree in the art of military education, Hitler was but a mere enlisted man with the rank of Corporal.
However both of these behemoths sought to conquer Europe. Hitler began with a political usurpation of a Democratic government and escalated his motives to terrorism and finally revolved into a grand Dictatorship. He bullied everyone including his highly competent military staff. Napoleon did the same. He controlled everything from the government of France to his highly competent military staff.
In both these leaders they made the same mistake. They underestimated the great bear of Russia.
Chandler has opened my eyes. The maps at times are very confusing. However the content is excellent. You must persevere in the reading. Stiff upper lip old boy. After all it was Wellington who won at Waterloo. Five Stars, good job!!



5 out of 5 stars Bruce   September 17, 2007
 2 out of 2 found this review helpful

I enjoyed this book thoroughly. The maps were excellent, the writing clear. I've read other reviews and there is some question of accuracy of details, but such arguments i'll leave to the professional historians/military folk. I give this book a real thumbs up for the average military reader such as myself.


5 out of 5 stars Berthier: Master eighteenth Century PM   May 13, 2007
 0 out of 4 found this review helpful

I bought this book after finishing a biography of George Washington, who is often compared to his contemporary, Napoleon, vis-a-vis their respective quality as military strategists, generals, & national leaders. Why did Napoleon fall into the trap that Washington avoided - clinging to an archaic model of political leadership? I don't know if the book answered that question or not (probably not).

Getting through all the campaigns took time, & as others have stated some of the maps were not user friendly. Nevertheless, deciphering them was well worth the effort. Never before have I understood - or cared to understand - the importance of coordination between cavalry, infantry, and artillery.

The drama of the gradual buildup to Imperial ascension (including the instructive blunder in Spain) followed by the disastrous Russian campaign with its formidable geographic distances and obstacles, disintegration of overextended supply lines, failure to disregard sunk costs, dogged belief in an unsupported interpretation of the motives and intentions of Tsar Alexander, and finally, the refutation of the myth of defeat by "general winter" more than repaid the price of the book and the weeks spent reading it.

One thing is certain - Napoleon's success was a joint venture. He was a genius and a charismatic leader, but he could not have accomplished what he did alone. Usually, his generals are given some of the credit, which is fair enough; but their post-exile performance deficit raises questions about exactly how much of Napoleon's rising fortune was attributable to their abilities.

Toward the end of the book the answer becomes clear. Napoleon was supported not just by exceptional generals but by a Project Manager of unparalleled ability who kept all the levels of planning, implementation, and communication under tight control at all times.

The breadth of Berthier's accomplishment is mind-boggling - Napoleon did the high-level specification with his maps & so forth; Bertier coordinated and implemented all the details to make the vision manifest. Anyone who has managed a large scale project under resource-poor, stressful conditions can appreciate the monumental organizational and administrative ability that made Napoleon's success possible: Bertier handled risk assessment, mitigation planning, budgeting, logistics, scheduling, and not the least - ensuring EFFECTIVE communication of directives and changes, which often required skillful interpretation / restructuring / redirection of muddled idiosyncratic orders from Napoleon. All under battle conditions.

To do what he did, Bertier had to quickly master Napoleon's strategic designand quickly determine what was needed to make it happen, AND what alterations to make when conditions changed, AND exactly how to communicate the changes so that the correct action would be taken by the generals at the appropriate time.

It's not surprising that Berthier wasn't successful managing campaigns on his own; he didn't have a person of equivalent ability to support him. Notice that Napoleon was also unsuccessful without Bertier's support.

After his final defeat, Napoleon stated that if Berthier had been with him the outcome of his post-exile battles would have been different. I do not think he was exaggerating. It was simply the truth, although it might have been Napoleon's first full realization of it.



5 out of 5 stars Excellent Book - Suffers form the Usual Poor Maps   April 24, 2006
 8 out of 9 found this review helpful

I thoroughly enjoyed this book. That said, this book suffered from the usual trouble of military history books: maps. The problem in most such books is a simple lack of maps, but in this regard, Campaigns of Napoleon ranks pretty well. The troubles here are more subtle:

* Many maps cover two facing pages and quite often important elements are in the gutter where they cannot be read. Obviously, important things are often near the middles of maps, so why not split the map to allow for the gutter?
* Many names of both places and minor generals are spelled differently in the text and on the maps. I assume the text is accurate, but the variations in spelling caused confusion more than once.
* Oftentimes a town would be named as a destination in the early stages of a campaign, that is, when the relevant maps are still at a large scale. The named, presumably small, town will not be found anywhere on the map. It seems to me that any town important enough to be named in the text should show up on a map that supports the text.

I know full well that this book was published long ago, and I will restate how much this book was a pleasure and contributed greatly to my knowledge of the man and his era. The obvious care in the text and scholarship was lost in this book when it was time to create the maps.



5 out of 5 stars The best single reference on the campaigns of Napoleon   March 12, 2006
 16 out of 17 found this review helpful

This is, without question, the best single volume reference in English on the campaigns of Napoleon. This book is not perfect, and I would agree with some of the negative points made by other reviewers, but I cannot understand how anyone would give this less than five stars. There is simply no other book that is even comparable to this one. This book is to the Napoleonic Wars what Shelby Foote's series is to the American Civil War, absolutely indispensible for any serious (amateur or professional) historian or student of the era.

This book is really three books in one: it is partly a biography of Napoleon, partly an analysis of his art of war, and partly a history of his campaigns. It covers NBs youth, his meteoric rise to prominance after the French Revolution, and every campaign that he participated in. I've read this book cover to cover three times, and individual chapters so many times that I've lost count. Chandler's writing style is engrossing and easy to read, not dry summaries of facts and events and dates. He is both a great writer and a great historian.

My (or others') disagreements with Chandler on individual points simply do not detract from this masterly work. I would agree, however, that this book is very Anglo-centric, probably its biggest drawback. Historians are often looking for `balance' in their assessments, and it is in this area that Chandler is weakest. I think he overplays the role of the English in ultimately defeating Napoleon, although this is a problem with virtually everthing that has been written about Napoleon by the English. Oddly, I would also agree that Chandler treats Napoleon with almost hero worship. Too much hyperbole perhaps, but this is more of a literary criticism of the text rather than historical. One negative comment that other reviewers have made regarding this book is that it is either factually incorrect or incomplete/not sufficiently detailed, etc. These are insignificant criticisms in my view. There are no gross historical errors in this book, either in facts or in interpretation, to my knowledge. If you want a balanced, broad view of any historical era, you must read a variety of primary and secondary sources. In the case of the Napoleonic wars, you must read French, German, and Russian sources as well. This book is not the only word on the subject, but the best written in English. This is the BEST book on the subject, this is one of the best histories ever written, even if neither perfect nor exhaustive.

I HIGHLY recommend this book. It is WELL worth the money to purchase it and the time spent to read it. If I had to throw out all but ten of my books, this is one of the ten I would keep. I would recommend this book to someone who is not particularly interested in the era, much as I would Foote's series. Don't pay any attention to the reviewers who have given this book less than five stars, they are niggling over trifles. This is an outstanding book.


Latest Military news
Powered by Associate-O-Matic

Contact Military Topix