The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security | 
 enlarge | Author: Grant T. Hammond
Publisher: Smithsonian
Category: Book
List Price: $17.95
Buy New: $11.22
You Save: $6.73 (37%)
New (9) Used (7) from $9.45
Avg. Customer Rating:  16 reviews
Sales Rank: 299228
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 248
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 8.8 x 5.9 x 0.6
ISBN: 158834178X
Dewey Decimal Number: 355
EAN: 9781588341785
ASIN: 158834178X
Publication Date: August 2004
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Brand new item. Over 4 million customers served. Order now. Selling online since 1995. Few left in stock - order soon. Code: H20081201225911P
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Breakthrough biography of a revolutionary thinker who transformed American military policy and practice. Based on extensive interviews with Boyd and with those who knew him, The Mind of War is the first biography of this pivotal figure in American military history. 13 b/w illustrations.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 11 more reviews...
 Build your Boyd Library... and know more than the AF does! November 17, 2008
While not written in the same style as Coram's "Boyd: the Fighter Pilot who changed the art of war," Dr. Hammond's book fills the gap between the mythology of Boyd (Coram's book) and the void of nothingness (OODA training provided by the US Air Force in professional military education). Hammond's book gives a sense of scholarly study to Col Boyd's work, without the bluster of personal anecdotes. Don't get me wrong - I have loved almost every text I have read on Col Boyd, personal and professional... but for usefulness in military strategy study, Hammond's book is head and shoulders above the rest.
Let's be honest - We're not going to become "Acolytes" by reading Boyd biographies - those positions are already taken. But understanding the difficulties Col Boyd had in trying to change the art of war and military establishment, we can open our minds to the realm of possibility... that everything is linked, and we might influence the next generation's John Boyd.
Shame on the United States Air Force for neglecting Col Boyd's contributions. If anyone needs a reminder about mavericks and warfare prophets, think of General Billy Mitchell; he was court martialed for his ideas on airpower and is now lauded in the halls of Air University.
Bolster your Boyd Background - buy Hammond's book, Coram's book, and download Boyd's print works from http://www.d-n-i.net
2 of the best books that I have ever read October 26, 2008
I have read both of the more well known books about John Boyd, Grant Hammonds book, the "Mind of War" and Robert Coram's book, "Boyd, the Fighter Pilot who Changed the Art of War."
Both are excellent works and I would suggest that if you are serious about studying John Boyd and his theories, first read Robert Coram's book which goes into more detail about John Boyd's life then if you are still interested, and you should be after reading Mr. Coram's book, I would move on to Grant Hammonds book which goes into more detail about John Boyd's theories of warfare.
All of the theories can be applied to almost any aspect of life, be it business, politics or just dealing with the general public and difficult people.
 Not quite what I needed September 17, 2008
I was hoping for a better description of Boyd's ideas and less time spent on his life. This guy revolutionized some major fields, but the book doesn't really tell me the guts of the concepts. Disappointing.
Balancing Boyd with Chesterton July 1, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
If you want to change the world for the better or just keep your little corner of it from getting worse, then you'll want to read this book. It's what Boyd discovered about how conflicts are fought and won. Sadly, although he flew in two wars, most of Boyd's clashes were fought within the US military rather than with some foreign foe. As a result, one of the best USAF fighter pilots who ever lived is better remembered by the Marine Corps, where he is a hero, than by his own branch.
I'm not going spend time praising Boyd. The fact that I finished this book with a list of books and articles to read is praise enough. Instead, I'm going to offer a useful corrective to Boyd the man, by introducing someone else you should read.
That someone is G. K. Chesterton, an Englishman with a maverick, warrior personality every bit as fierce and unyielding as Boyd's. On June 1, 1941, on one of the darkest days in World War II, when the island of Crete had fallen to the Germans, leaving 17,000 British soldiers as prisoners of war, the Times of London, defiantly put these lines from Chesterton's "The Ballad of the White Horse" on its front page:
I tell you naught for your comfort,
Yea naught for your desire,
Save that the sky grows darker yet
And the sea rises higher.
Like Boyd, Chesterton understood that how we fight determines if we win or lose. He shared Boyd's contempt for those who believe that bigger is better. In a 1909 at the height of England's fears about new German battleships, Chesterton wrote precisely what Boyd would later say about fighter aircraft.
"Common-sense tells a man that indefinite development in one direction must in practice over-reach itself... If you perceive your enemy plunging on blindly in a particular direction, the real thing to do, if you have any spirit and invention, is to calculate the weakness in his course and advance yourself in some other direction. You ought to take advantage of his infatuation, not to imitate it; you ought to surprise his plan of campaign, not copy it laboriously. If he is building very big ships, the best thing you could do would probably be to build small ones; ships lighter, quicker, and more capable of navigating rivers."
But Chesterton understood something that Boyd never learned, an aspect of warfare that's so often forgotten today that the very word for it seems quaint--chivalry. Perhaps his best explanation of chivalry came in a 1906 article explaining why the Europe of his day dominated the world. Again Chesterton described a concept dear to Boyd, the power that comes from an ability to think new thoughts and imagine new ways of acting.
"The elements that make Europe upon the whole the most humanitarian civilisation are precisely the elements that make it upon the whole the strongest. For the power which makes a man able to entertain a good impulse is the same as that which enables him to make a good gun; it is imagination."
Boyd thought like a fighter pilot. He would have us understand a man in order to destroy him, knowing that a foe who's blown out of the air will never trouble you again. As a writer, Chesterton had a different perspective. He believed that understanding leads to restraint, writing in that same article: "For if you do not understand a man you cannot crush him. And if you do understand him, very probably you will not."
Chesterton saw conflict in broad terms. When he clashed with H. G. Wells over the latter's infatuation with a World State or with Bernard Shaw over pacifism, he took the time to understand what each was saying. His criticisms of the dangers and weakness of international institutions are among the best ever written. His description of the pacifist personality is so accurate that it applies with near perfection to today's pacifists. But having gotten into the mind of his opponent, he recognized in him a fellow human being. With few exceptions, he retained the respect and even friendship of his foes. Only when one crossed a critical line, demonstrating that without great pain he was beyond redemption, would Chesterton seek to crush him to prevent the evil he intended. What was for Boyd the rule, destroying anyone who disagree with him, was for Chesterton the rare exception. Boyd needs to be tempered with Chesterton
In short, I'd suggest that, as you read what Boyd said about war and conflict, you also read what Chesterton wrote. You'll accomplish a lot more and suffer far less grief if you do. And as you might suspect, I wrote a book on that topic, a collection of Chesterton's best articles on war and peace paying particular attention to his warnings about Germany. And when the necessity arose, Chesterton could be as tough-minded as Boyd. Chesterton used all his powers as a writer to crush those ideas in the German mind that Nazism would later exploit.
--Michael W. Perry, editor of Chesterton on War and Peace: Battling the Ideas and Movements that Led to Nazism and World War II
The OODA Loop November 24, 2007
The OODA loop is an affirmation of my theorized belief that all we do in life follows a pattern. The successes and the failures of our endeavors is relative to the degree of our adherence to the said pattern and our familiarity with the task. God Bless the late Col. John Boyd.
|
|
|
