Arsenals of Folly: The Making of the Nuclear Arms Race | 
enlarge | Author: Richard Rhodes Publisher: Knopf Category: Book
List Price: $28.95 Buy New: $15.99 You Save: $12.96 (45%)
New (26) Used (10) Collectible (2) from $14.00
Avg. Customer Rating: 12 reviews Sales Rank: 60747
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1 Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 400 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7 Dimensions (in): 9.4 x 6 x 1.5
ISBN: 0375414134 Dewey Decimal Number: 355.021709045 EAN: 9780375414138 ASIN: 0375414134
Publication Date: October 9, 2007 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
From the Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Making of the Atomic Bomb: the story of the entire postwar superpower arms race, climaxing during the Reagan-Gorbachev decade when the United States and the Soviet Union came within scant hours of nuclear war—and then nearly agreed to abolish nuclear weapons.
In a narrative that reads like a thriller, Rhodes reveals how the Reagan administration’s unprecedented arms buildup in the early 1980s led ailing Soviet leader Yuri Andropov to conclude that Reagan must be preparing for a nuclear war. In the fall of 1983, when NATO staged a larger than usual series of field exercises that included, uniquely, a practice run-up to a nuclear attack, the Soviet military came very close to launching a defensive first strike on Europe and North America. With Soviet aircraft loaded with nuclear bombs warming up on East German runways, U.S. intelligence organizations finally realized the danger. Then Reagan, out of deep conviction, launched the arms-reduction campaign of his second presidential term and set the stage for his famous 1986 summit meeting with Gorbachev in Reykjavik, Iceland, and the breakthroughs that followed.
Rhodes reveals the early influence of neoconservatives and right-wing figures such as Richard Perle, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and Paul Wolfowitz. We see how Perle in particular sabotaged the Reykjavik meeting by convincing Reagan that mutual nuclear disarmament meant giving up his cherished dream of strategic defense (the Star Wars system). Rhodes’s detailed exploration of these and other events constitutes a prehistory of the neoconservatives, demonstrating that the manipulation of government and public opinion with fake intelligence and threat inflation that the administration of George W. Bush has used to justify the current “war on terror” and the disastrous invasion of Iraq were developed and applied in the Reagan era and even before.
Drawing on personal interviews with both Soviet and U.S. participants, and on a wealth of new documentation, memoir literature, and oral history that has become available only in the past ten years, Rhodes recounts what actually happened in the final years of the Cold War that led to its dramatic end. The story is new, compelling, and continually surprising—a revelatory re-creation of a hugely important era of our recent history.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 7 more reviews...
Best book about the Cold War I've read May 26, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
An amazing conclusion to Rhodes' trilogy about the Bomb. As always, riveting and filled with fascinating anecdotes. The reflections at the end of this book about the collapse of the Soviet Union and our own country's current path will stay with you for days. Bravo!
Rhode's Book of Folly: Remaking History Post Cold War May 19, 2008 3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I really enjoyed the first half of this book and learned quite a bit about what life in the U.S.S.R. may have been like. It was a sad commentary on what life is like under Communist rule, with a ray of hope found in Michael Gorbachev and his rise to power.
A little over half way thru the book Rhodes completely loses his bearing when President Reagan becomes the focus of his writing. His critique of Reagan's foreign policy, and Ronald Reagan the man, is so hate-filled that any chance for Rhodes to return to an historical narrative similar to the first half of this book was lost. For example, Reagan is initially portrayed as a provocative lunatic taunting the Soviet Union with the hopes of starting WWIII - there is some truth here, since Reagan did want to unhinge the Leaders of the Soviet Union, but not as a means to provoke them into making a first strike. He also emphasized Reagan's reinvigoration of the arms race with the intent to bankrupt the Soviet Union by doing so - again, some truth here but disingenuous in the context presented by Rhodes. For all of Reagan's short-comings including; a lack of knowledge of nuclear arsenal, ability to only comprehend a subject if it was in a movie (a conclusion based upon the fact that Reagan used to be an actor, thus Hollywood movies where the only way he could learn); his romantic, dreamy nature which divorced him from reality (didn't King have a dream?), Reagan certainly made an impression on the KGB, Communist Leaders, and the World.
For Rhodes this impression seems up for grabs as he portrays Reagan as the worst thing that could have happened to the U.S. and the world during such a crisis. To state the obvious the U.S.S.R. fell without a first strike or an all out nuclear war, and many Russian leaders including Michael Gorbachev, felt that it was President Reagan's foreign policy which caused this fall. If you would like to investigate the specific actions taken during Reagan's Presidency, or a counter balance to Rhodes' book of Folly, I would recommend "Victory: The Reagan Administration's Secret Strategy That Hastened the Collapse of the Soviet Union" by Peter Schweizer.
Best book on peace issue March 3, 2008 3 out of 6 found this review helpful
Since 1984, when I was permitted to teach a law school seminar which I laughingly called "Law and World Peace," I have read several thousand books on "the peace issue." Of those over 3,000 books, I believe that this is the BEST one! It gives a full feel for the reasons why we do need to replace nuclear deterrence with common security.
Disappointed February 29, 2008 7 out of 7 found this review helpful
I learned much from Rhodes's "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" and "Dark Sun", and my learning (and enjoyment, despite the subject matter) continued through the first part of the book, discussing Chernobyl. The it stopped. Rhodes served up a recap of the excellent early Cold War history from "Dark Sun" and then, rather suddenly, switched to a bone-dry diplomatic history of arms control that was neither comprehensive nor novel. At times, pages on end seemed to be little more than a transcript of Gorbachev - Reagan meetings. Riveting as those were, I'd lived through that history and can get this from the academic literature. I'd hoped for more from this great popular historian.
Dreadful Rehash of Leftist Dogma February 19, 2008 12 out of 24 found this review helpful
This is an examination of the nuclear arms control negotiations between Reagan and Gorbachev in the late 1980s. Rhodes writes from a tediously partisan Leftist perspective, and one sees all the usual boring Leftist tropes here: Reagan stupid and primitive, Gorbachev the real genius who saved the world, neocons evil, "moderate pragmatists" good, SDI pointless, expensive, and ineffective, and the poor Soviets not aggressive but simply reacting to enemy encirclement and provocation. The most grotesque and offensive claim in this book is that the US shares the blame for the Soviet shootdown of a Korean passenger airliner in 1983 that killed 269 civilians, because previously that year the US Navy had conducted some exercises in the north Pacific that provoked the Soviets. Sorry, Rhodes, but the deliberate murder of civilians cannot be justified, least of all by US military exercises that did not kill anybody. Less offensive, if more predictable, is Rhodes's bootlicking treatment of Gorbachev, the farsighted genius who changed world history, so unlike the clownish President Reagan. Yeah, whatever.
Despite the lying claims inside the jacket cover, there is nothing really new and interesting in this book. Rhodes presents little or nothing in the way of new information, and he relies almost exclusively on secondary sources, in particular the memoirs of Gorbachev and George Shultz. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any significant point in this book that was not already made in Frances FitzGerald's "Way Out There in the Blue". Since Rhodes shares FitzGerald's ideological perspectives, if you have already read FitzGerald's book there is no point at all in reading this book.
Another minor point. The book is subtitled "The Making of the Nuclear Arms Race" and the cover picture is of a nuclear test in Nevada in 1957. So, one might expect that the subject of this book might be the nuclear arms race in the 1940s and 1950s. Not so. There is some discussion of the nuclear arms race before 1985, but basically the entire book is about Reagan and Gorbachev's nuclear arms negotiations in the late 1980s. Why doesn't this book have a title and cover picture appropriate to its content?
|
|
|